I know I am a self-aware person, but I have to admit that I am still not quite sure what it means to be a future-aware person. I often think about the “what if?” scenarios in my head, and I’ve heard of people that think they are future-aware, but they aren’t. To me, this is because I don’t consider the future to be an actual thing.
The future is a thing that only exists in the mind of a person, but is very fuzzy to the person who does not have a clear idea of the future. When people ask me if I believe in the future, I would like to say that I do, but the truth is, I do not. To me, the future is just the future as it is now, and the future that we all seem to be heading towards now.
In fact, if you were to ask me if I was a future-aware person, I would say probably not. I would also say that I dont see the future as being any more real then the present, and that the future that we all seem to be going towards is actually a future that we all seem to be heading towards.
There is a saying that says that “fear is a liar”, and while this is true, I think we are all afraid at some time or another. In a way, it is the fear of the unknown that is the most dangerous. When we are afraid that something bad is going to happen, then we are not only willing to do things that might cause harm to ourselves, we are willing to do things that could actually cause harm to others.
While we might fear the unknown, we also fear what might happen if we don’t do anything. We can sometimes avoid this fear by either being more responsible or by taking matters into our own hands. We can either avoid the fear by trying to act more responsibly, by doing something that might cause harm ourselves (like speeding while driving), or we can take matters into our own hands by doing something that will actually cause harm to others (like shooting someone).
Although most of us have a tendency to think that the only reason we don’t want to do something is because of a fear of hurting ourselves, it’s actually because we don’t want to cause harm to others. A lot of us have a tendency to assume that doing something that would cause harm to another person is not a “good” thing.
The thing is, even if you don’t want to do something terrible to another person, you can still do it. We can be a tad reckless, we can be a tad selfish, but we can still do something that could cause harm to others without having to do anything terrible. In fact, the way we can do this is by acting in a way that is likely to cause harm to others.
One of the things I love about acting in movies is that the acting has a lot of randomness. In a film we can be the hero, the villain, the hero’s sidekick, or an antagonist. All of these roles are possible in a film, but not all of them are equally possible, and even if they are, a character can still be considered a good or bad actor if he has the right to be one.
In a movie, it is not enough to just be good. The character has to also be good, and good actors can have an influence over the plot. The movie “Fatal Attraction” was perhaps the first movie to have a true ensemble cast, and one of the main reasons for its success was the influence of a few of the main actors.
In film, the lead actor has more say in the outcome of the film than the lead actress, because each actor is a full-fledged actor who is, in essence, a part of the whole. The actor in question is a kind of a “character”, and they are a kind of a “character actor” because they have more influence over the outcome of the film than the actress. That’s not to say that the actress is entirely powerless, of course.